Constitutional law and ideas about constitutional law.

  • Irreconcilable Differences

    Irreconcilable Differences

    No, Denzel, it’s not fun anymore. The US federal government has cut itself loose from reality, but we still share a continent with them. As we update our priors and talk about our relationships, we can also consider the limits of comparative constitutional law. After everything the Americans have said and done, how much more can…

  • Frameworks forever

    Framework frequency remains low, even unremarkable, in the young 2025 term. Of course, numbers never tell the whole story. When we look closely at how the Justices have used frameworks this year, we can see just how critical this concept has become to their understanding of the law. In Working Families Coalition, Karakatsanis J wrote for…

  • Literacy and Legitimacy Part Deux

    Literacy and Legitimacy Part Deux

    In Ontario (Attorney General) v. Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc., 2025 SCC 5, the Court considered the constitutionality of Ontario legislation that limited the amount third parties could spend on political advertising in the year prior to a provincial election. The five-justice majority opinion recognized the foundational importance of the right to vote protected by s. 3 of…

  • The Final Framework Countdown

    The Final Framework Countdown

    As the Supreme Court of Canada begins its 2025 term, let us turn one last time to the great framework frenzy of 2024. The league table ended 2024 largely unchanged from our mid-term update. Despite a brief resurgence in York Region, the Court could not maintain its framework form and managed only one case in double digits…

  • Constitutional Crossroads

    Constitutional Crossroads

    On this site, I’ve paid a lot of attention to how the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) used principles during its 2024 term. I’ve been looking (maybe a little too closely) at the Justices’ reasons and trying to find new ways to understand the SCC’s work: to make metaphors like “basic constitutional structure” and “internal architecture” a little less familiar, a…

  • Literacy and Legitimacy

    Literacy and Legitimacy

    The Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competences (PIAAC) is an intensive, longitudinal assessment of skills within the adult populations of the member states of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.  The PIAAC assesses adult literacy skills on a scale from Level 1 to Level 5. Canada has conducted the PIAAC twice. According to…

  • The Shadow Constitution

    Carl Jung wrote “The shadow personifies everything that the subject refuses to acknowledge about himself and yet is always thrusting itself upon him directly or indirectly.”[1] For Jung, the shadow was neither good nor bad; it was inevitable and presented a persistent moral or even existential challenge to the conscious self. Jung and his acolytes applied…

  • The Imperatives of Power

    Towards the end of its reasons, which dealt at length with the existence and extent of government immunity for unconstitutional laws, the majority in Canada (Attorney General) v. Power, 2024 SCC 26, wrote that where “the balance of constitutional principles tilts in favour of state immunity…the constitutional imperative that the government be afforded the autonomy to…

  • The Structures of Power

    The standard model of the Canadian Constitution involves two structures: an internal structure and an institutional structure. The internal structure can be understood as what the Constitution is, whereas the institutional structure can be understood as what the Constitution establishes. This double aspect of constitutional structure is reflected in many Supreme Court of Canada reasons, including: Each…

  • The Principles of Power

    The majority in Power v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 SCC 26 insists constitutional principles like “constitutionality and the rule of law” are “an essential part of our constitutional law” (¶5). This position is consistent with the unanimous opinion in Re Quebec Secession, which stated that underlying constitutional principles are “foundational” (¶49), and even the majority in Toronto (City): “Unwritten…

Interesting case? New idea?